Philosophers have been thinking about
the impact storytelling has on society since ancient Greece. Socrates famously
outlines rules and reasons for a strict censorship in Plato’s Republic, and more recent philosophers such as Sartre
employed playwriting as a way to explore philosophical concepts.
Today, many thinkers and writers
are beginning to pay more attention to how our culture understands people of
different genders and races through the stories we tell. It seems implicit that
the movies we watch, or the video games we play, have some sort of impact on
who we are as a community. Possibly the biggest fear of storytelling, as well
as the biggest reason for censorship, is how it affects children. Like Socrates
argues in The Republic, people often
fear that allowing children to bare witness to bad behavior will increase the
chances that the children will behave badly themselves.
While examining film and literature
seems like a valuable way to understand and mold a given culture, it seems investigating
America’s modern obsession with athletic competition can offer a similar type
of knowledge. Socrates suggests that allowing children to watch good people do
questionable things can potentially lead to confusion. If children see a good
person do something bad, then they might think it is good to do bad things. The
underlying assumption is that children form important and lasting opinions
about how to behave at an early age. It follows, then, that we must be careful
about what we teach them, about what we allow them to see.
But what, if anything, do America’s
children learn from sports?
According to statistics gathered by
usafootball.com, 7.6 million High School boys play football in America. So many
people watch the Super Bowl each year that airing single commercial costs
millions of dollars, and a single ticket to the game is worth thousands. It is
hard to deny how popular sports are in America, but perhaps we should continue
to think about how this continuously growing obsession is impacting our
culture, particularly our youth.
To explore the life of one of the
7.6 million Americans currently playing High School football, we must begin at
the age of eight. The third grade is a common time to begin playing football in
America, although that age is diminishing. By the time a young athlete hits
High School, playing football becomes something more like a full-time job. The
season ends in the fall, sometime around Thanksgiving, if you make it to the
championship. The pre-season, which typically consists of weight lifting,
conditioning, and “student-lead” practices, begins in the spring. Practice
continues throughout the summer, and some time in August almost every High
School football team will begin practicing two times a day.
If a High School student wants to
play two sports, say baseball and football, their schedule becomes even more
intense. Travel baseball season begins as soon as High School baseball season
ends. Each summer, two-sport athletes commonly find themselves balancing
football practices with the roughly 100 baseball games they play as well.
This intense dedication doesn’t
simply start in High School. To offer a personal example, I began playing
travel baseball when I was 13 years old, and that was a year or two later than
many of my friends. It is also important to note that this type of commitment
is not only required of young men. Just like boys travel baseball, girl’s
soccer and volleyball teams travel the country playing a multitude of games
during the High School off-season with equal vigor.
Why are these trends significant?
Having our youth dedicate so much time to athletics calls us to entertain an
interesting conclusion: various sports and sport cultures are raising many of
America’s children. Things become more interesting when we challenge this
conclusion with a question raised earlier in this article. What do our children
learn from dedicating so much effort and time to sports?
Just like with literature and film,
this question becomes difficult to answer as soon as you begin. Because
athletics now require so much time and dedication to succeed even at the lowest
levels, athletes have begun “specializing” at young ages. This has allowed many
of the most popular sports to develop their own unique cultures. Some parents
and families spend their summers traveling the country to play baseball and
others travel the country to play basketball. It seems to follow that a young
boy might learn different things from playing baseball his whole life than if he
had played basketball; he would have been surrounded by different people and
immersed in a different game.
There are, however, some
characteristics that apply to all sports in general. One of the more discussed
and obvious examples is competition. In sports, there is a winner and a loser.
Teams or individuals compete with the goal to win—the point of playing the game
is to try and win the game. With this in mind, we can see how raising children
to play sports means raising children to compete. Almost as soon as they are
old enough to run, kids are signed up to begin competing against one another.
The
possible negative ramifications associated with raising our children to become
over competitive have not gone unnoticed. Youth sport leagues now usually give
out participation trophies of some sort to each player, regardless of whether
or not their team won the championship that year. The term “ everyone gets a
trophy these days” is a running joke amongst mothers and fathers in the stands
of their children’s games. Our culture has already grown more sensitive to the
often-ruthless nature of competitive sports, and many parents have begun taking
measures to guard their children against harsh realities.
The possible negative ramifications associated with raising
our children to become over competitive have not gone unnoticed. Youth sport
leagues now usually give out participation trophies of some sort to each
player, regardless of whether or not their team won the championship that year.
The term “ everyone gets a trophy these days” is a running joke amongst mothers
and fathers in the stands of their children’s games. Our culture has already
grown more sensitive to the often-ruthless nature of competitive sports, and
many parents have begun taking measures to guard their children against harsh
realities, but the debate continues. The New York Times ran an article titled “
Losing Is Good for You” this past fall, and many parents currently resent
efforts to minimize competitive attitudes in youth sports.
While discussions about our
children being raised in an over competitive environment are happening around
the country, the impact sports have on our culture reaches far beyond a single
concern. The potential downsides to our fascination with athletic competition (e.g.
extreme time commitments and pressure to succeed) shouldn’t be considered
without remembering the positives as well. Sports teach our children how to
struggle and compete to achieve a goal, and I suppose we live in a world where
such skills are useful. Many of America’s best thinkers dedicate their time to
exploring how the books we read impact the people we become, but perhaps we
should focusing more of our efforts on examining something many children spend
hours doing every day: playing organized sports.
I wish to discuss the idea of "participation awards." Are these awards different than what we get at say, Wabash College? Are these types of awards any different than maybe the woman/african american who's given a job because the company has to higher so many? Are these awards any different than what our culture has taught us to accept as normal? I really want to hear a good argument either way, but I will say that we haven't done our children any good by raising them in a culture where things are given and not earned. Whether that type of culture is good or bad may be for another discussion but as far as participation awards in sports; is it any different for those of us outside of the organized sports realm, and if not, we probably agree, therefore discussing the goodness or faultiness with this type of culture may serve as a better discussion.
ReplyDelete^Get em.
ReplyDeleteOn given and not earned, I think that that culture is useful in pushing a political stance on government redistribution because if the newer generations are generations of folks that feel entitled to a trophy as opposed to earning the trophy, then hell yes, lets redistribute everything...but that is a whole other topic...or is it?
Mike, I am going to go ahead and say that I have a huge problem with the devaluing of the competition in organised children's sports. Namely because winning is NOT for everybody in every case. Winning is for the ones that ended up on top. And as far as my eye can see, a place where everyone is on top without having earned the position will result in under-achievement.
On another note, I really believe that, given the big business of the professional American Past-times, i.e. football, baseball, basketball, the youth sports is given far more emphasis than it should have in our culture. we are like spartans sending our children to train for battle at the age of seven. Feeding the professional sports machine our youth to spit out the unworthy ones and cultivate the ones that look more promising to be ball player, to be stars, to be the best warriors, the best gladiators, the best at raking in ticket sales and apparel sales...
There is so many things that one could strive to be good at that receive so much less attention, and in some cases cause one to be subject to ridicule. For instance, a young kid being treated badly at school because she is on the robotics team or another young child being ostracized because he is in the marching band. These things, they cultivate the mind, and are infinitely more useful than watching some overpaid and overrated ball-player cause irreversible cell death to his brain and degrade the essential tissues of his body for what we call as a society a sport. This is a bit beyond your argument, but I think that it goes to show a counter-argument to the everyone gets a trophy ploy that many youth leagues have imposed.
Trevor, I would agree with you on the whole devaluing competition. I think it is a very important idea to discuss, mostly because of how scary it can be when we go overboard with our kid's athletics, but the whole "everyone gets a trophy" trend makes me weary as well. I think it is important to look at sports in a new way so we can understand the impact they have on us a little better, but I also think we need to make sure and avoid the typical criticism of all competition altogether.
DeleteTruly spirited discussion, gentlemen--well written remarks all around. On the commentary about sending our children off to train like Spartans, I would just like to add that although the writer may feel that a young student on the robotics club or in the band may be working toward something "infinitely more useful" than watching athletic competitions, some of the same warnings about over-programming our youth apply to those extracurricular activities. I do not have children, but I am keenly aware of just how competitive LIFE can be for our youth in this day and age.
ReplyDeleteMany of us first think of the intensifying competition and training / preparatory possibilities for our junior athletes today since they typify the phenomenon (AAU traveling all year-round, anyone?), but are the rigors of preparing to be the best any less stressful in competitive jazz band or chess club? I would assert that the deepening competition in nearly all facets of daily life is becoming something to easily overwhelm children…and parents / adults. I am energized to see that some students elect to give it their all and focus on their dreams in theatre, band, and many other non-sport pursuits, and the results seem clear—hyper-competition is producing better arts / science / games / etc. Look at the talent levels on display in the under-18 age groups in singing and dancing competitions today, and you’ll see that they have come leaps and bounds from where they were 20 years ago…just as have athletics (the NCAA had to make the one-and-done rule to keep basketball interesting as 18-yr olds were dominating the NBA draft). What I think we must all continue to ask ourselves, however, is how best to achieve the proverbial balance between studying / practicing and being a regular Joe / Jane. When our youth see some of their peers and competitors pursuing athletics or arts ruthlessly, at a cost to developing themselves as a well-rounded and well-adjusted citizen, will they be able to eschew the arms race?
Continuing to teach “everything in moderation, nothing in excess” might be the most challenging lesson for a parent or teacher in these times…
Gary Campbell ‘99